This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 11, 1207–1216, doi:10.3762/bjnano.11.105
Figure 1: Positions of nanoparticles inside the test cube: a) initial moment; b) after 0.1 ms (thickness of t...
Figure 2: Positions of nanoparticles inside the test cube: a) initial moment; b) after 0.1 ms (thickness of t...
Figure 3: Average values of the effective magnetic relaxation time versus thickness of the nanoparticle coati...
Figure 4: Average values of the effective magnetic relaxation time versus thickness of the nanoparticle coati...
Figure 5: Average values of the effective magnetic relaxation time versus polymer surface density at differen...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 2173–2182, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.223
Figure 1: (a) Néel relaxation time and (b) effective relaxation time vs volume fraction of nanoparticles with...
Figure 2: (a) Néel relaxation time and (b) effective relaxation time vs volume fraction of nanoparticles with...
Figure 3: SLP vs volume fraction of nanoparticles: (a) diameter 7 nm, (b) diameter 17 nm.
Figure 4: SLP vs local volume fraction in clusters of nanoparticles: (a) diameter 7 nm, (b) diameter 17 nm.
Figure 5: (a) Average magnetic field and (b) average normalized energy barriers vs volume fraction for nanopa...
Figure 6: SLP vs diameter of the nanoparticles.